A Homecare Management Solution Buyer's Guide: Navigating the Decision to Adopt Hospital-in-the-Home Programs
But is a Homecare management solution right for your hospital?
This buyer's guide explores the key factors in the decision-making process, weighing pros and cons to help administrators, clinicians, and stakeholders make an informed choice. Drawing from established programs like Johns Hopkins' HaH model and recent data, we'll break down clinical, financial, operational, and regulatory considerations. For Australian hospitals, HITH is well-supported through established policies under the National Health Reform Agreement, integrating it into standard public hospital funding models.
Key Factors in the Decision-Making Process
Can the hospital identify enough patients who meet the criteria for safe and effective at-home care?
A Homecare management solution is suitable for patients with acute conditions such as pneumonia or heart failure that require hospital-level monitoring and treatment but don’t necessitate intensive care. Programs like Johns Hopkins’ HaH model often focus on elderly patients or those at risk of hospital-acquired complications.
For: If your hospital serves a population with conditions manageable at home (e.g., 50% of low-complexity cases or 10% of high-complexity cases, per some analyses), a Homecare management solution could be viable.
Against: If most patients require ICU-level care or complex diagnostics unavailable at home, adoption may be impractical.
2. Cost Savings and Financial Impact
Does the potential for cost reduction justify the investment in infrastructure and staffing?
Studies show a Homecare management solution can reduce care costs by 19-30% compared to traditional inpatient care by avoiding fixed hospital overheads, reducing lengths of stay, and minimising lab/diagnostic tests. Additional revenue may come from backfilling freed-up beds with higher-acuity patients.
For: If your hospital faces capacity constraints or seeks to optimize reimbursements (e.g., through Australia's Activity Based Funding (ABF) model under the National Health Reform Agreement), a Homecare management solution could yield significant savings (e.g., $3,000 per encounter).
Against: High upfront costs for equipment (e.g., remote monitoring devices, portable diagnostics) and outsourcing to vendors may strain budgets without guaranteed coverage from all payers.
3. Patient Outcomes and Satisfaction
Will a Homecare management solution improve clinical outcomes and patient experience compared to inpatient care?
Evidence suggests lower rates of mortality, delirium, and hospital-acquired infections with a Homecare management solution, alongside higher patient satisfaction due to the comfort of home. Johns Hopkins reports better outcomes and fewer complications, and recent reports confirm lower mortality rates and reduced post-discharge costs.
For: If patient-centered care and reducing readmissions (e.g., 7% vs. 23% in traditional care) are priorities, a Homecare management solution aligns well.
Against: If patient safety concerns (e.g., lack of immediate emergency response) outweigh benefits, traditional care may be preferred.
4. Operational Feasibility
Does the hospital have the infrastructure, staff, and technology to implement a Homecare management solution effectively?
A Homecare management solution requires daily clinician visits, 24/7 telehealth support, and robust logistics (e.g., medical gas, portable imaging). Many hospitals partner with vendors for turnkey solutions.
For: If your hospital can leverage existing telehealth systems or secure reliable vendor support, implementation is feasible.
Against: If workforce shortages or lack of scalable technology (e.g., rural settings with poor internet) hinder execution, a Homecare management solution may falter.
5. Regulatory and Reimbursement Landscape
Are there sufficient incentives and legal frameworks to support a Homecare management solution adoption?
In Australia, HITH is integrated into standard public hospital funding models via the National Health Reform Agreement, providing Activity Based Funding (ABF) for HITH services as inpatient care. State-specific guidelines, such as those in Queensland, Victoria, and South Australia, further support implementation.
For: If your hospital can capitalise on these established funding mechanisms or anticipates ongoing support, a Homecare management solution is attractive.
Against: Variability in private insurer coverage or state-specific policy differences could limit financial viability.
6. Market Differentiation and Capacity Management
Consideration: Can a Homecare management solution provide a competitive edge or address bed shortages?
A Homecare management solution frees up inpatient beds, potentially increasing access for higher-acuity patients and generating additional revenue (e.g., $10,000 per backfilled admission). It also positions hospitals as innovative.
For: If your hospital struggles with throughput or seeks to stand out in a competitive market, a Homecare management solution offers strategic value.
Against: If bed capacity isn’t a bottleneck or market perception isn’t a concern, the effort may not be justified.
7. Physician and Staff Buy-In
Will clinicians support transitioning care to the home setting?
Physicians may resist due to perceived safety risks, legal liability, or disruption to workflows. Successful programs (e.g., Mount Sinai’s) require training and collaboration.
For: If staff can be convinced through evidence and pilot success, a Homecare management solution can proceed smoothly.
Against: Strong resistance or lack of training resources could derail adoption.
8. Decision Framework
To evaluate a Homecare management solution adoption, follow this step-by-step framework:
- Assess Patient Population: Analyse admission data to estimate eligible cases (e.g., DRGs like pneumonia, DVT).
- Evaluate Costs vs. Savings: Model startup costs (equipment, staffing) against projected savings and revenue.
- Test Outcomes: Conduct a pilot to measure clinical results and patient feedback.
- Check Infrastructure: Audit telehealth, logistics, and vendor options.
- Review Regulations: Confirm reimbursement eligibility and compliance requirements under the National Health Reform Agreement and state guidelines.
- Gauge Stakeholder Support: Survey clinicians and administrators for alignment.
9. Pros and Cons Summary
Financial
Pros: Cost savings (19-30% per encounter); increased revenue from backfilled beds.
Cons: High initial investment; variability in private payer coverage.
Clinical
Pros: Improved outcomes (lower complications, readmissions, mortality); enhanced patient satisfaction.
Cons: Safety and liability concerns.
Operational
Pros: Increased bed capacity; market appeal as an innovative provider p>
Cons: Dependence on technology and vendors; workforce challenges.
10. Recommendation
A hospital should adopt a Homecare management solution if it:
- Serves a sizable population with eligible conditions.
- Can secure funding and infrastructure for a pilot.
- Operates in a reimbursement-friendly environment (e.g., leveraging Activity Based Funding under the National Health Reform Agreement).
- Faces capacity or cost pressures that a Homecare management solution can alleviate.
Conversely, it should reconsider if:
- Patient safety risks are unmanageable.
- Financial or operational resources are insufficient.
- Policy support varies significantly by state or payer.
A Homecare management solution represents a forward-thinking shift in healthcare delivery, backed by growing evidence of its efficacy. However, success hinges on careful assessment and adaptation to your hospital's unique context. As policies continue to support HITH through frameworks like the National Health Reform Agreement, now is an opportune time to explore pilots and partnerships. For the latest on funding guidelines and program data, consult official sources such as state health departments or recent reports.
The Future of Home-Based Care is Here
By leveraging Kyte’s HITH technology, hospitals can future-proof their services, cut costs, and improve patient outcomes.
Feel free to get in touch or book a meeting .